Are Your Salaried Employees Actually Hourly Workers?

Washington's Threshold for Exempt Workers is the Highest in the Nation

Joe Fain  |  May 1, 2026

Minimum wage has caught a lot of attention in Washington state over the last few years. We have the highest statewide minimum wage in the nation at $17.13 per hour, and the top five cities in the nation, Tukwila, Seatac, Burien, Renton, and Seattle are all right here in King County. Tukwila earns the top spot at $21.65 this year.

What many employers are not tracking as closely is the impact of rulemaking by state Labor & Industries that has fundamentally redefined what it means to be an "exempt" worker in Washington since the pandemic.

Washington State has some of the most stringent labor regulations in the nation. The state's salary threshold for exempt employees is by far the highest in the nation, and it is scheduled to keep climbing through 2028. For employers across every industry and sector, including employers of any size, understanding this framework is not just a matter of compliance, it is now emerging as key strategic business consideration.

What Is the Exempt Employee Salary Threshold?

Under both federal and Washington State law, certain "white collar" employees can be classified as exempt from overtime pay, minimum wage protections, and paid sick leave tracking requirements. To qualify for this exemption, an employee must pass a three-part test:

Salary Basis Test. The employee must be paid a fixed salary and not be compensated hourly.

Salary Level Test. The employee's salary must meet or exceed a minimum dollar threshold set by law. Bonus payment does not count towards achieving this threshold.

Duties Test. The employee's primary job responsibilities must qualify as executive, administrative, or professional (EAP) in nature. There are also other special rules within the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) for employees in outside sales or computer professionals.

Washington's Threshold: Where It Stands Today

Effective January 1, 2026, Washington's salary threshold for exempt employees is $80,168.40 per year ($1,541.70 per week), 2.25 times the state's current minimum wage of $17.13 per hour. By 2028 it is projected to rise to near $93,000 when the phase-in to 2.5 times minimum wage is complete. Workers categorized as computer professionals (programmers, developers, etc.) will be even higher at 3.5 times minimum wage.

For comparison the federal threshold under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) has remained unchanged for years at just $35,568 annually ($684/week).

The phase-in schedule was adopted through rulemaking by L&I back in 2020. The state has broad authority under both the voter-approved 2016 minimum wage law, and the 1959 Minimum Wage Act, to set the definitions for "overtime exempt" workers.

How Washington Compares to Other States

Washington is an aggressive outlier relative to every other state in the nation. Even California, with its notably pro-labor legal environment, is significantly below Washington's threshold.

This gap potentially compounds the broader cost-of-doing-business differential between Washington and both our Sun Belt and East Coast competitors.

Is It That Big A Deal? A Balanced Look

The rules are designed to keep companies from designating line-workers and lower-paid staff with lofty managerial titles as a way of working them more than 40 hours per week without the uncertainty, cost, and compliance headache of paying overtime.

There have certainly been egregious examples of this, particularly in the retail and hospitality industry, where "assistant managers" who perform the same duties as hourly staff have been allegedly up-titled to avoid paying overtime.

However, the changing nature of work has made this a difficult needle to thread. The long lunch, midday shopping trip, doctor's visit, and afternoon school pickup were once flexibility perks most often enjoyed by upper management. Today, they are more commonplace among office workers at all income levels.

Employees in many industries appreciate the freedom to work at all hours of the day without a set schedule.

Washington law also places the burden of proof onto the employer to show that an alleged overtime violation is demonstrably false. That coupled with the skyrocketing threshold has created a rough transition period where many employers are unaware that they are exposed to the potential risk of back pay going back as far as three years, and potentially treble damages.

This higher risk environment is likely to provoke several reactions in the years ahead.

Remote Work in Washington

Bringing employees back to a physical office is still controversial for many Washington workplaces. But the only way to remove the risk that non-exempt remote employees pose is by having them physically clock-in and clock-out.

Remote Work Outside Washington

For many companies who feel that they can succeed with a remote workforce, hiring employees outside the state of Washington will become significantly more attractive. Washington's high cost of living and huge salary demands coupled with stringent labor regulations will make hiring remote employees outside of Washington (where these rules don't apply) highly attractive.

Annoying Compliance

Both employees and employers alike are likely to disdain the added time-tracking obligations that companies will impose on their non-exempt workforce. However, for companies who have regularly kept their employees under the 40-hour threshold, the only cost involved should be the added burden of ensuring employees complete their required weekly time-reports.

Compensation Restructuring

Many employees who would be otherwise exempt may see their pay boosted or see their bonus structure absorbed into their base pay to ensure it counts towards satisfying the minimum threshold. Others on the margins could see modest pay increases to keep track with the ongoing CPI adjustments once the new threshold is full phased in in 2028.

What An Employer Should Do Now

Audit Every Exempt Position. Pull a complete roster of all employees currently classified as exempt and confirm if their base compensation and duties qualify them for exempt status.

Raise or Reclassify. For each exempt employee whose salary falls below the threshold employers must decide to reclassify as non-exempt or raise the employee's pay to meet the new threshold.

Keep Records. All non-exempt employees will need access to weekly time-tracking and employers must be diligent at ensuring compliance. These records will be one of the few pieces of evidence that could defend against an allegation of minimum-wage violations.

Budget Ahead. Understand the choice you make will snowball. 2027 and 2028 will bring another significant jump in the threshold, after which it will rise along with CPI.

Update Documentation. Every change in exempt status or compensation level should be reflected in offer letters and employment agreements, job descriptions, employee handbooks, and payroll and HR systems. HR and payroll staff should receive updated training each January.

Concerns & Competitiveness

Washington's exempt salary threshold doesn't exist in isolation. It sits atop already prohibitive regulations that drive labor costs above most benchmark states.

The math is tough and getting tougher by the year. A mid-level manager earning $72,000 per year is fully exempt from overtime in California, Colorado, New York, and essentially every other state in the country. In Washington, that same employee in that same role requires overtime tracking, overtime pay, and all the administrative and Human Resource infrastructure that comes with nonexempt status.

Employers who operate in multiple states are running these numbers every time a position opens, every time a budget is built, and every time a decision is made about where to locate a team or expand a function. As we approach $93,000 by 2028, Washington is asking employers to clear a bar that no other state comes close to requiring.

The concern isn't that Washington's worker protections are wrong in their intent. Some standard to protect against overtime and classification abuses are undoubtedly reasonable. The concern is that the system is set on autopilot. Previous attempts to adjust the multiplier or come closer to matching states as progressive as California have been met with crickets. A calculation that may have made sense in 2020 feels different when it lands on top of a $9 billion business tax package, a minimum wage that is already the highest in the nation, skyrocketing Unemployment Insurance rates, a new income tax, and an Association of Washington Business employer sentiment survey showing only 14 percent of Washington businesses plan to expand in the state.

The exemption threshold is just another in a long line of policies that make Washington an uncompetitive outlier in a tightening competition for future job growth. There has been little to no political pressure to encourage lawmakers to revisit these policies. As our unemployment rate here in King County ticks even higher, now 4th highest among the 50 most populous counties in America, employers and the job-seeking public are paying attention.